According to this article and this study from the Society of Biblical Literature and the American Academy of Religion, tenure-track jobs in religious studies are slowly disappearing. Here is a taste of Scott Jaschik's article in Inside Higher Ed:
The report by the American Academy of Religion and the Society of
Biblical Literature examines job trends from 2001-2010 and finds modest
but steady growth up until 2008, with the number of job listings
dropping by 46 percent in 2009. The figures are based on the number of
positions listed with the two associations. The report acknowledged that
not all jobs are listed with the groups, but many disciplinary
associations do similar studies based on the listings they receive and
the ups and downs of the market are generally well-reflected in these
data.
In 2010, the number of jobs bounced back by 24 percent, but the field
ended the decade with fewer jobs being listed than was the case at the
start of the period.
Of particular concern to the associations was a shift in the type of
jobs advertised. Historically, the vast majority of jobs listed with the
two associations have been tenure-track positions, as was the case with
82 percent of jobs listed in 2008. But in 2009, that figured dropped to
51 percent, and it rose to only 61 percent in 2010 -- so not only are
there fewer jobs, but positions promising the possibility of job
security are in even shorter supply. The report says that a key issue
going forward will be to see whether this shift away from a tenure-track
norm is "temporary" or a "reconfiguration" of the academic job market.
6 comments:
Maybe I should switch from Biblical Studies to History.
I wonder if I would be set back all that much, having a BA in Biblical/Theological Studies, and studying history in my spare time.
This is the second year I've seriously paid attention to the job market and the first year that I am seriously looking for a job. I think there has been a slight bounce back in terms of tenure-track jobs in the past two years. Nearly all of the jobs I applied to this year were TT. They were spread between general/comparative/world religions positions and American religion positions. So, yes, things are bad, but they are getting a little better.
I'm curious why you think a history Ph.D. with a dissertation on religion would have a better shot at a job in American religion than a religion Ph.D. Do you mean in a history dept. or in a religion dept? It seems that the history Ph.D. won't have the theoretical background or breadth in religious traditions to teach the lower level courses and core major courses in a religion dept. But I could be wrong.
This is actually the question I'm facing right now. I'm considering doing a one year Masters program in Religious Studies at an UK university, and then coming back to the States to do something in US religious history.
Michael: Obviously a Ph.D in history will teach in a history departmasnt and a Ph.D in religion will teach in a religious studies department. You can do American religious history in both, but your teaching load is going to be diferent depending on the department. If you want to study American religious history I think that you have a better chance landing an academic job in history than religion.
Gotcha. That makes sense. Though I do think a history PhD has a descent chance of jumping into a religion dept.--more than the other way around.
Yes, Michael. I agree about this, although both are rare. Most history departments will not want religion Ph.Ds and vice-versa.
Post a Comment