piece in The New York Times, Barack Obama is not a "history buff." I am not sure what this means, but my hunch is that he is not interested in anecdotes or stories from the specific events in the past, nor does he read history for entertainment or enjoyment.
According to Jodi Kantor's article, he is only interested in the past for the ways it can help him govern. He naturally gravitates towards a useable past.
Here is a taste:
From the first time Barack Obama
summoned the country’s leading presidential historians to dinner, they
saw that the type of discussion he wanted would be different from their
talks with previous Oval Office occupants.
There was almost no small talk, for this was no idle exercise. Though
Mr. Obama knew many of his predecessors’ stories cold, he was no history
buff: he showed little curiosity about their personalities and almost
no interest in the founding fathers. His goal, the historians realized,
was more strategic. He wanted to apply the lessons of past presidential
triumphs and failures to his own urgent project of setting the country
on a new path.
Does the past teach us lessons? Of course it does. It is natural for us to look to the past for people and events that will help us navigate life in the present. As I will argue in a forthcoming book, this is an important use of the past. But it is not the only use of the past. Stay tuned.