The New Republic is running an older, but still relevant, essay on the history of Christmas by cultural critic and historian Jackson Lears. It is definitely worth a read. Here is a taste:
Which did not necessarily mean that they had lost their religious
significance. In many cases the impresarios of the spectacle were
sincere, believing Christians. Consider John Wanamaker. Every Christmas,
beginning in the 1910s, he transformed the Grand Court of his
Philadelphia department store into a virtual cathedral, complete with
the largest pipe organ in the world. The practice continued after his
death in 1922, well into the 1950s. And judging by their ecstatic
correspondence to the store, which Schmidt quotes effectively, many
shoppers had what could be described as a religious experience in the
Grand Court. Writing in 1949, one man found his heart “strangely warmed”
as he sang carols there amid the “reverent throng,” feeling “the tie of
brotherhood” to these strangers. It was “as if ‘Someone, whom I shall
not name,’ had ‘turned a switch’ and sent ‘the happy current of
Christmas’ through this ‘sea of faces.’"
The evangelical tradition of a personal God and close-knit community
had faded into impersonality. The event was sponsored by John Wanamaker
(and Philadelphia Electric) rather than John Wesley. Yet who could deny
the genuineness of the moment, for all its fleeting anonymity? The rise
of a “spectacle of spirituality” was not simply a bait-and-switch scheme
concocted by wily merchants. Customers demanded a mix of sacred and
profane, and merchants struggled to keep up. The commercial Christmas
developed into a “tangle of piety and plenty.”

No comments:
Post a Comment