Over at U.S. History Scene, Hillary Murtha has a great piece on teaching American history with objects. She shows how to use a wristwatch as a window into the culture of the 1960s "race to the moon."
Here are Murtha's "final thoughts":
I have chosen here to interpret the Moonwatch primarily as evidence
of cultural responses to the socio-political trends in the 1960s and
70s. Obviously, it could be viewed in other contexts: for example as
having a particular place within the history of American time-keeping,
from the sundial to the standard-time railway schedule, from the
factory-bell to the punch-clock, from the village tower-clock to the
satellite signals sent to today’s mobile devices. If we were examining
the Moonwatch in this relationship, we would be interested in the nature
of its works (hand-wound, pre-dating both the self-winding feature and
the quartz crystal movement) and in how representative a timepiece it
was in 1970s America. The context in which an object is viewed
determines the nature of our inquiries into it.
Any history teacher who wishes to incorporate material culture into
his/her lesson plans can search available databases for appropriate
articles from material-culture based journals (some of which I have
listed below). They may also consider consulting the curators of local history museums
and historic societies about relevant objects the institutions may hold
in their collections. Most elementary school students have the
experience of being taken on a field trip to a history museum where they
see a recreated colonial or pioneer kitchen, witness a demonstration of
the spinning wheel, blacksmithing, or some other handcraft, and learn
through re-enactment, how people ate, worked, dressed “back then.”
Unfortunately, instead of taking this material-culture based learning
experience to more sophisticated and adult levels as students move into
secondary school and beyond, it is generally abandoned. As the history
profession is becoming more receptive to material culture studies, and
beginning to acknowledge that the field employs a set of methodologies
as rigorous and exacting as the more traditionalist interpretations of
documentary evidence, secondary and college-level instructors can mine
the field and enrich their student’s classroom experiences.

No comments:
Post a Comment