Stanford University will pay for humanities graduate students who want to pursue careers as high school teachers. Here is a taste of an article at Inside Higher Ed:
The plan consists of a new course offering that will expose graduate
students to humanities issues in high school pedagogy and curriculum,
and a promise by the School of Humanities and Sciences to fully fund
each humanities Ph.D. admitted to the competitive Stanford Teacher
Education Program in the Graduate School of Education.
Over at Northwest History, Larry Cebula thinks it is a bad idea:
The Stanford plan is terrible in all kinds of ways. High school social
studies jobs are already scarce, and it is not clear if a PhD will make a
job seeker more competitive or less. While a broad knowledge is
absolutely necessary for a good high school teacher, the
hyper-specialization and research focus of a doctoral program is not a
path to that broad knowledge. The time commitment is enormous--perhaps 7
or 8 years to the PhD (though Stanford is trying to cut this to 5) and
then another 2 for the education degree--for a job that you might have
landed with an undergraduate degree. And as a Facebook friend of mine
said when I shared the article, "Hope they can coach a sport."
The real problem of course, is the overproduction of PhDs in humanities fields. Year after year, and despite the warnings,
thousands of your people come to places like Stanford to earn a PhD
with the unlikely goal of becoming college professors. "The primary goal
of Stanford's Department of History's graduate program is the training
of scholars. Most students who receive doctorates in the program will go
on to teach at colleges or universities," Stanford tells its prospective history graduate students, offering a link to "placements." The link is broken.
Read Cebula's entire post here.