Some of you have been following this debate occurring across the proverbial pond. Callum Brown concluded that "Christian Britain" is dead. Prime Minister David Cameron disagreed. Rowan Williams landed somewhere in the middle.
If you want to get caught up on this debate I encourage you to read Brantley Gasaway's recent post at Religion in American History. Here is a taste:
For those of us who study American religion, this recent British debate can remind us once again of the ambiguity of identifying a country as a "Christian nation." What qualifies a country as "Christian"? Is it the official establishment of a Christian church (but if so, then is Great Britain "Christian" while the United States is not)? Is it a matter of the historical influence of Christianity upon a nation's laws, politics, and culture (but if so, when does this historical influence matter less than the contemporary relevance of Christianity in the public sphere)? Is it a matter of demographics (but if so, does a simple majority of self-identified Christians qualify a nation as "Christian")? Is it the close alignment of a country's policies with the Christian ethics of peace and justice? Or it is the number of references to God in a country's passport?
As some of you know I took a shot at this whole issue in the context of the United States.