I am guessing that this was the first time Novak has ever been mentioned in a presidential debate. Here is what Kasich, an evangelical Anglican, said about Novak last night before he was cut off by the moderators:
I was struck by the way Kasich used Novak. Usually when Christians employ Novak they do so in order to make an argument that capitalism is compatible with the aims and goals of Christianity. I am sure Kasich would agree with this reading of Novak. But Kasich also appears to have read Novak in a different way, or at least with a different emphasis. Unlike most free-market Christians, Kasich used Novak to defend the moral regulation of free enterprise and capitalism. It is rare to hear someone lead with the moral restraint dimensions of Novak's argument. (Much like it is rare to hear people discuss Adam Smith by leading with his reference to the "invisible hand.").